点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
东西问 | 短评：疫情防控应续保希望与信心******
中新社北京12月1日电 题：疫情防控应续保希望与信心
作者 徐皇冠
入冬以来，中国国内本土疫情形势仍严峻复杂且出现新变化，在关键时期和吃劲阶段，更要理性认识，坚定信心，行稳致远。
十里崎岖半里平，一峰才送一峰迎。新冠疫情是对全人类的新挑战，人类必定要在摸索中寻找应对之策，此时学会运用辩证法缕析“变与不变”显得必要：既要抓住“不变”的七寸，以保持战略定力；又要牵好“变”的牛鼻子，因时因势持续优化完善防控政策，走小步不停步，坚持第九版防控方案，落实二十条优化措施，使具体实践科学、精准和有效。
资料图：图为市民有序排队进行核酸检测。马铭言 摄抗击疫情，病毒在变，中外的应对也在变。新冠病毒从原始毒株，到德尔塔、奥密克戎，特点从致死率高变为致病性减弱。与病毒抗争，中国从早期深壕硬寨打响保卫战到常态化防控，继而强调“精准科学”“以快制快”。有的国家则逐渐从严阵以待，转为主动或被动“放开”，在试图以此恢复正常经济社会秩序的同时，也付出沉痛代价。
疫情三年，人们的心境在变，直观对比外国的应对情况，也容易使人产生误解与误读。加之，抗疫中的突发个案影响人们的身心。如何在变幻纷扰中继续前行？必须重新聚焦“从何而来，往何处去”的问题，从全貌把握事物的总和，看到变化中的不变。
人们看到，抗击疫情三年，中国坚持人民至上、生命至上的初心没有变，行动没有变。中国始终以最大努力保护人民的生命安全和身体健康，始终为民众计、为根本计、为长远计。获得的成果，也有目共睹。
近三年来，从整体看，中国的新冠肺炎死亡病例、住院病例，远低于全球平均值，经济总体也延续恢复态势。这是人民至上、生命至上的生动体现，也是中国防疫政策科学性的真实写照。
资料图：“猎鹰号”硬气膜实验室在广州投入使用。郑佳玲 摄如果注意到中国“一老一小”群体数量庞大、国家人均医疗资源水平与发达国家还有差距等事实，再看中国共产党和政府对防疫科学性的追求和部署会更客观。11月30日，国务院副总理孙春兰在国家卫生健康委召开座谈会时指出，近三年来，防控措施因时因势优化完善，先后印发九版防控方案，出台二十条优化措施。要以人民为中心，稳中求进，持续优化防控政策，走小步不停步，不断完善诊断、检测、收治、隔离等措施，加强全人群特别是老年人免疫接种，加快治疗药物和医疗资源准备。八位专家在座谈会上发言，她充分肯定专家在防控中的重要贡献。
当然，言明中国疫情防控成果的客观性、政策的科学性，回应在新一轮疫情复杂态势下人民对美好生活愈发真切、迫切的向往，还有不少急难愁盼的问题需要解决，落细落实疫情防控，还有很多的事要办、路要走。
随着奥密克戎病毒致病性的减弱、疫苗接种的普及、防控经验的积累，中国疫情防控面临新形势新任务。不辞山路远，踏雪也相过。在统筹变与不变中理性认识，增强定力，以描“工笔画”的态度担负起防控责任，既不能“一放了之”，也要坚决防止“走样”和“加码”，共渡难关需要智慧和勇气，也呼唤信心与暖举。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)